Monday, September 07, 2009

Is Mehsud really dead?

Confusion still prevails over the announced killing of the terror kingpin

The death of top Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud by a US drone attack has been by and large hailed in Pakistan. It not only sent a sigh of relief amongst the people who have been braving suicide attacks for many years but was equally greeted by the media.

Business Recorder, Pakistan’s top financial daily’s headline said: ‘Eliminated.’ The most influential English daily Dawn’s headline was ‘Good riddance, killer Baitullah.’ The News, another national daily was a bit cautious. Its headline was, ‘Is messenger of death dead?’

Pakistan’s top defence analyst and scholar Dr Hasan Askari-Rizvi believes Mehsud’s death would not only bring solace to the vast majority of Pakistani people but also boost the morale of Pakistan army that has lately been pretty active against the Taliban. “Baitullah was the leading Taliban leader who dominated the political scene since 2007. His death is positive news for Pakistan and provides the Pakistan military with an opportunity to assert itself in South Waziristan while the Taliban movement is passing through a leadership transition,” he told TSI. But Dr Mutahir Ahmed, Professor of International Relations at the University of Karachi and an expert on Afghanistan has a different view. “It’s true there will be a setback to the Taliban in the transition phase but it will have little impact in the long run since Taliban’s command and control system is in Afghanistan,” he said. “If he is really dead, it will be the first high value target killing in an operation against the Taliban and subdue criticism against Pakistan army that has been blamed for failing to kill the top leadership of Taliban,” he added.

Tauseef Ahmed Khan, Professor of Mass Communication at Karachi’s Federal Urdu University and a well-known political analyst said: “If Baitullah is really dead, Benazir Bhutto’s murder case will be put in cold storage since he was the main accused in the assassination of Pakistan’s former prime minister.” He was of the view that even if Baitullah Mehsud is dead, it won’t be difficult for the fundamentalist section of Pakistan establishment to create another Baitullah.

According to media reports, Mehsud, 35, was killed in a missile strike by an unmanned US drone on August 5. No wonder Taliban leadership initially denied that Mehsud has been killed but on August 7, a top Taliban leader Kafayat Ullah confirmed that Mehsud and his second wife have died. Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister also confirmed that the dreaded Taliban leader was dead. “According to my sources, the news is correct,” Qureshi said. “He has been taken out.” Enjoying support from senior al-Qaeda leaders and with an estimated 20,000 fighters at his disposal, Mehsud emerged on Pakistani scenario in 2005 after signing a controversial peace deal with the Pakistan army and has been carrying out suicide bombings across Pakistan, including capital city Islamabad. He was also accused of assassinating two-time PM and chairperson Pakistan People’s Party, Benazir Bhutto, an accusation he denied. In March, the US put a $5 million bounty on his head followed by another $650,000 by Pakistan government but he remained elusive. While it is largely believed that the US drone has successfully hit the target on August 5, a BBC report on August 8 said, Taliban Commander Hakimullah Mehsud claimed the reports about Mehsud’s death were “ridiculous.”

He told the BBC the reports of his death were the work of US and Pakistani intelligence agencies. He said the US and Pakistani intelligence agencies wanted Mehsud to come out in the open so they could achieve their target. He said he would issue a message in the next few days.

For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2008
An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Tuesday, September 01, 2009

Amitabh Bachchan - Rebel with a capital B

“He refuses to bend, he refuses to crawl, He’s always at home with his back to the wall. And he’s proud of his scars and the battles he’s lost, And he struggles and bleeds as he hangs on the cross-And he likes to be known as the angry young man.” - Billy Joel, 'Angry Young Man'

He counter culture wave of the 1960s spawned many rebels - with or without a cause. But the one rebellious image that has remained the most enduring is that of the ‘angry young man’, indelibly etched into the hearts and minds of all Indians who have been fans of Amitabh Bachchan’s portrayal of protagonists modeled on that concept. The 70s were a time in India where a lot in the system seemed wrong. Restrictions stifled creative vents; politics had held economic development hostage and the rising unemployment and disillusionment with the establishment tormented the youth. As a protest symbol, the concept of the rebellious angry young man was an import from Britain (specifically realist theater in London in the 50s and 60s) but Amitabh Bachchan’s characters gave the term a whole new spin representing the hero battling injustice. ‘Vijay’ was created by Salim-Javed in numerous scripts, most memorably in films like “Zanjeer”, ‘Shakti’ and “Deewar”. Says film producer Ramesh Sippy, who was the producer and director of “Sholay”, “The term ‘angry young man’ was coined for Mr. Amitabh Bachchan and the credit goes to Salim-Javed who gave a vent to the burning anger of a common man in the society. Their films “Deewar” and “Zanjeer” were the trendsetters and there is no one more apt and befitting for the role of angry young man than Amitabh Bachhan.” Sippy’s assessment is perhaps based on the adulation that Bachchan earned by playing a character that touched a chord with the viewers at large providing them a sort of a moral anchor as well as the inspiration to rebel against injustice.
For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2008
An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Monday, August 31, 2009

VP singh - Contrarian to the core

It is ironical in a way that VP Singh – who hailed from a royal family – always had power within his reach but when he actually laid his hands on it, it drifted away from him. That happened partly because of his fickle-mindedness and partly because of his zeal to take up the cause of the poor and downtrodden. One such example comes from very early period of his life when impressed with Vinoba Bhave’s Bhoodan Movement, he donated his entire inheritance in land. He had to bear the ire of his family.

He started his political career as a young socialist under Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna but defected to the Congress with Chandra Shekhar. During the Emergency, he supported Indira wholeheartedly. He was made UPCC chief and later Chief Minister of the state. But when the time came to enjoy power, he had a tiff with the PM over the Moradabad riots. Indira blamed the state government. VP thought otherwise. He resigned and announced it through a radio journalist from Allahabad, in true VP style.

He earned the trust of Rajiv Gandhi but took on the latter’s friends, Amitabh Bachchan and Dhirubhai Ambani. Rajiv removed him from the post of Finance Minister. A peeved VP dropped the Bofors bombshell. He switched allegiance once again and was made Prime Minister by Jan Morcha. Here, too, he carried on with his rebellion. He revived the dormant Mandal Commission report and implemented its recommendations. People still remember him for this final act of his, but he was a bigger rebel than he is perceived to be.
For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2008
An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

"IIPM Press Article" - JLo’s ‘happily ever after’…

One of the most desirable divas, Jennifer Lopez, has recently made some surprising revelations about herself. The 40-year-old actress is computer illiterate and hates to even go near them! She also admitted that her marriage with Marc Anthony and parenthood has changed her a lot, but it hasn’t helped her overcome her fear for darkness. Now, a mother of twins, JLo has apparently found the perfect life with hubby, Marc, and her tiny tots. With the escalating rate of celebrity divorces, here’s someone who can give lessons on leading a happy family life!

For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2008

An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Operation blue star - "IIPM News"

As a index of business confidence, what could be more revealing that the decision by India’s leading industrial houses – the Tatas, Reliance, Bharti – to make colossal investments in the state. Bharti chief, Sunil Mittal who is famous for transforming the telephone landscape in India by introducing mobile phones, now wants to bring about Punjab’s ‘second’ agricultural Punjab farmers will be growing the fruit, vegetables and herbs that will be sold in retail outlets all over the country.

Mittal wants to export Punjab’s produce. Reliance, which has mammoth retail plans for a nationwide chain of supermarkets, is also planning to source its fresh supermarket produce from Punjab.

The situation as we (I and Mark Tully) saw it in our book `Amritsar, Mrs Gandhi's last battle' has changed. ``The Punjab crisis showed just how unsuitable the institutions of the Raj were for coping with the problems of modern India. The police were helpless because their ranks had been undermined by years of inadequate pay and its corollory, corruption - both features of the raj's police force too.'' Quite a sea change nearly three decades down the line.

'Bhindranwale more popular than Bhagat Singh'

Daljeet Singh Bittu belongs to that breed of separatist leaders who have greatly influenced young minds. In the 1980s and 90s, he remained underground for 10 years and played an important role in continuing the movement for an independent Sikh nation. After his arrest in April 1996, he spent ten years in prison at Nabha and Tihar jails, as guests of the Indian state. After his release, he has worked towards reigniting the old fire in the youth by democratic means. The aim, though, remains the same: a separate Sikh nation. He spoke to Anil Pandey on the critical decades beginning with Operation Blue Star to current developments.

Your take on Operation Blue Star?

Instead of calling it Operation Blue Star, we term it as an attack on ‘Darbar Sahab’. It was an attack on Guru Granth Sahab, Sikh identity and Sikh nation. We can never forget this attack. We want to carry on the wounds inflicted as an inspiration for our demand for a separate nation. Akal Takht and Darbar Sahab have been attacked before as well. Sikhs never forgot it, instead they took revenge.

Military action was taken against terrorists hiding in the Golden Temple.

Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala was not a terrorist but a great Sikh. He gave a new definition to Guru Granth Sahib. The state may consider Bhindranwala as terrorist, but the common Sikh accepts him as a priest warrior who revisited Sikh glory. He was and will remain to be a hero for Sikhs

There is no evidence of popular support to a separate Sikh nation. Does it mean the movement is dead?

No, this movement is not over. Instead, it is just below the surface. Even today every Sikh prays ‘Khalsa will rule’ (`raaj karega Khalsa’). If you want to know the truth of this movement, then go talk to the youth. You can see pictures of Bhindranwale on the mobile phone screens of students, his songs set as ring tones. His pictures are sold even more than Bhagat Singh.

Is formation of a Sikh nation not anti-Indian?

This demand is not against Hindus or the state. It is being wrongly presented. Establishing Khalsa rule is the desire of every Sikh. Khalsa rule means life as per Sikh religion. But, instead of giving us our rights, the government commits atrocities. During the process of being underground, whichever house I lived, police killed those people brutally.

Will you ever again pick weapons to get your demand accepted?

See, the method to fight depends on time. At present we are demanding our right according to democratic means. But if the situation becomes like the one in 1984 then this method can change.

Do you feel that Indian government will accept your demand?

Establishing a Sikh nation is difficult but we will achieve it.

Is it right the way you use weapons for your demand to be accepted?

Our Sikh religion preaches the use of arms against injustice but not for exploitation. Kripaan is put before the Guru Granth Sahib as a symbol of weapon. We have a tradition of Raaj kare ya lad mare (either rule or die).

Bhindranwala used the Golden Temple as his hiding place.

During the wars against Mughals, Sikhs waged it by taking refuge in the guru’s dwellings or gurudwaras. Bhindranwala also started living in Golden Temple only when he was attacked six times in two months. He had fear of getting killed by the police
For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2008
An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative