Friday, July 13, 2012

“There is pressure on Indian banks to consolidate”

Dr. Rupa Rege Nitsure, Chief Economist of Bank of Baroda talks to B&E on whether Indian banks are ready for tough days ahead

B&E: Is the Indian banking industry in a position to grow and survive if the economic scenario deteriorates further and if recession strikes the Indian and global economy?
Dr. Rupa Rege Nitsure (DRRN):
In the global context, India is the second fastest growing economy (vis-à-vis other large-sized economies) and has a well-balanced economic structure. It is not highly dependent either on foreign financing or foreign demand, as some other countries are. And its banking sector is well capitalised and enjoys a c. Moreover, the Reserve Bank of India did demonstrate a high degree of flexibility and responsiveness during the last global financial meltdown. So even if the economic scenario worsens, our banking industry and its regulators are in a position to handle the situation well.

B&E: But NPAs are a concern – you cant deny that. How serious a concern are NPAs for Indian banks at this point of time as per you?
DRRN:
Banks always see some growth in their NPAs during cyclical downturns and that cannot be ruled out this time also. However, no alarming signals are visible as of today. The Indian banking industry’s gross NPAs stood at 2.3% during 2010-11 and rating agencies & banking analysts expect this to grow by 3 percentage points in the current financial year, which is quite reasonable in the current phase of high inflation and interest rates. So honestly, NPAs are not a big concern.

B&E: Do you believe that new banking licenses can play a significant role in achieving complete financial inclusion?
DRRN:
That may not happen automatically. The RBI will have to actively administer in order to ensure that new private banks play their contributory role in the mammoth task of financial inclusion. Without an active policy intervention, this “objective” cannot be met. Going by the experience so far, it is a misnomer to think that unbanked areas and disadvantaged sections would be served by the newest of the private banks.

B&E: At 20.2%, Bank of Baroda has posted a reasonable y-o-y rise in profit during the last quarter, which amounted to Rs.10.33 billion along with a 23.6% rise in net interest income. But considering that forecasts for the Indian economy is appearing more and more discouraging by the month, on what note do you expect to end the current financial year?
DRRN:
Given the bank’s well-diversified domestic and international loanbook, modest exposure to sensitive sectors, relatively higher proportion of low-cost (CASA) deposits, good traction of fee-based income and lowest incremental delinquency ratios (in the Indian banking sector) for the past several quarters, we are confident to end the current financial year successfully, and consistent with our past performance.
B&E: NPAs don’t worry you. Even a slowing economy doesn’t. Then what does? Isn’t there something which Bank of Baroda is concerned about?
DRRN: The bank does not have any concern intrinsic to its own operations. But uncertain economic situation and volatility in financial markets are enough concerns for any banking entity to remain vigilant and responsive to early warning signals. So we are not immune to turmoil in the macroeconomic scenario – both domestic and global. No one entity is.

B&E: The bank’s total business expanded by 23.9% (y-o-y) to Rs.5.45 trillion in Q1FY2012. Doesn’t such a financial performance set you thinking of plans for further business expansion? Also, how do you plan to retain the current margin levels?
DRRN:
The bank’s business focus in the past few years has been “Sustainable growth with a focus on quality”. Hence, the key focal point for us is to give an acceptable “Return on Average Assets” to all our stakeholders, than concentrate on and worry about “size”. We have been managing our profit margin well through better Current Account-Savings Account (CASA) mobilisation, prudent pricing of retail term deposits, efficient pricing of loans and minimisation of credit costs.

B&E: How important is the retail banking business to Bank of Baroda? How much does retail banking contribute to the bank’s annual revenues?
DRRN:
For any bank in a country like India which has a strong demographic profile, retail banking is a major growth driver. In the bank’s domestic credit book, the share of retail loans has always remained between 18.0% to 20.0% for the last seven-eight years. The yield on retail advances is also relatively higher and to that extent it is definitely a strong value proposition. However, given the Bank’s thrust on “diversification”, the Bank has avoided the temptation of growing aggressively in any one direction. So we may not become the biggest retail players, but we will definitely be amongst the strongest in this respect.

B&E: Which sectors will play a role in accelerating the growth of the Indian banking industry in near future?
DRRN:
The Indian banking industry will see good growth opportunities in agriculture & agro-based industries and in sectors like pharmaceuticals, food processing and services, in near future. However, from a long term perspective, the infrastructure sector will continue to be the main growth driver.



Thursday, July 12, 2012

Weird open sky policies!

Millions in this world are still condemned to live without a roof on their heads. Rather than blaming it on destiny, it’s time that the ‘haves’ did their duty more proactively

“The human right to adequate housing is the right of every woman, man, youth and child to gain and sustain a safe and secure home and community in which to live in peace and dignity.” The Universal Declaration of Human Rights on adequate housing for everyone has been generously accepted by every country and has been a part of many constitutions; but unfortunately, it has not been accomplished effectively in practice. There is a global housing crisis here and now, and we are not talking about the vagaries of the real-estate market.

The most widespread and shameful phenomenon is forced eviction or the removal of people against their will from their homes or property, which is sought after by the government and private developers. These people either become homeless or move to remote or slum areas. However, people living in slums and informal settlements are particularly in danger from forced eviction. Currently, more than one billion people live in slums across the world. More surprisingly, United Nations has projected that more than two billion people will live in slums by 2030. In Nigeria alone, more than two million people have been forcibly evicted from their homes since 2000. Around seven lakh people lost their dwellings in a single mass eviction campaign called Operation Murambatsvina (“Operation Drive Out Rubbish”) in 2005 in Zimbabwe. The Central American Council on Housing and Human Settlements (CCVAH) revealed that around 43% of the 43 million inhabitants of the seven countries in Central America – Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama – lack decent housing.

But the problem is not limited to only poor and least developing countries in Africa and Central America. Rights to housing have been ignored in developing countries (like India & China) as well as developed countries (like US). As per UN-HABITAT, there are 3 million people live without adequate housing in the European Council. HUD’s Homeless Assessment Report to Congress exposed that there were 671,888 homeless persons in the US in 2008. In recent times, migration has become a serious problem throughout the world. As a result, almost 200 million migrants have faced discrimination in housing.


A Rs.15 billion rich NGO!

BCCI should be taxed as it is no more a national sporting body

It might sound absurd that the world’s richest sporting authority needs tax exemption. That’s the state of affairs at present with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). In a request to the Indian government, the board demanded that it be recognized as an NGO and given some tax waivers.

However, if one goes by numbers, BCCI is one of the richest sporting bodies of the world today and mints tremendous wealth through various commercial and private tie-ups. The IPL franchise model is a crying instance of how BCCI is now more of a commercial organisation rather than a board to promote sports in the country. The board is now more concerned with its own bottom line rather than the cause of cricket and cricketers. Even in the recent past, BCCI has not started any coaching centres, awareness programs or training camps to promote the game and has not constructed any sporting complexes either. As a matter of fact, tax exemption for BCCI was withdrawn in 2007 as it was observed that the board was no longer a body working for national sporting interests.




Tuesday, July 10, 2012

From theory to practice

India ‘s constitution defines the country as a democracy, but countries without a consolidated constitution are more democratic in reality

In the famous Gettysburg Address (in November 1863 in Pennsylvania), American President Abraham Lincoln described a democratic republic as a “government of the people, by the people, for the people”. However, the real forms of democracy prevailing throughout the world vary.

Whether a country will be democratic or not is more or less delineated in its constitution. The Indian constitution is a compilation of the constitutions of various other countries and it declared India to be a “sovereign socialist secular democratic republic”. Though the preamble labels India as a “democratic republic”, true democracy is still a chimera even today, some 64 years after independence. In the Democracy Index 2010 (released by Economist Intelligence Unit), only 26 nations (with a mere 12.3% of world population) were considered as being fully democratic and India is languishing at 40 (score 7.28) under the category of flawed democracies. It scores low in particular on the parameters of political participation and political culture.

What is even more shocking is the manner in which India is slipping on several important parameters of measuring democracy. This eventually led to a fall in the score from 7.8 in 2008 to 7.28 in 2010.


Monday, July 09, 2012

Our stupid obsession with Narendra Modi

The countdown to a macabre anniversary has begun and the media has already started reliving those gory moments and days. Even if you want to, there is simply no way you can avoid reliving the horror. Yes, I am talking about the burning of the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express – in which 'Kar Sevaks' were travelling from Ayodhya – at the Godhra station on February 27, 2002, and the subsequent riots in Gujarat that led to the brutal deaths of about 2,000 human beings, most of them Muslims. There is little doubt now that a lot of those killings were conducted in an organised manner and the state government failed to protect innocent citizens. Of course, I must say that the manner in which our secular fundamentalists use the word 'Genocide' to describe the 2002 Gujarat riots have a deeply perverted sense of history as well as the English language. I find it stranger still when the same folk insist that the burning alive of 59 children, women and men inside a train compartment was merely an accident, or a conspiracy hatched by Hindu fanatics to provide ammunition for the pogrom (there goes another word) against Muslims in Gujarat.

Since 2002, no other man or woman in contemporary Indian history has been demonised the way Narendra Modi has been. And as the 10th anniversary of Gujarat riots approaches, you can bet many pundits will dish out more armchair psychiatric nonsense while claiming to analyse the psyche of a ‘mass murderer’ (there goes another word) like Narendra Modi. The more polite and possibly more objective ones will say how the taint of the Gujarat riots will prevent Modi from being able to play a more effective and meaningful role in national politics and even in BJP (God knows how desperately the BJP needs a national leader at this juncture). The more ideologically perverted types will continue to declare him persona non grata. By the way, our Indian comrades managed to convince Capitalist and Imperialist America to deny a visa to Modi. But I guess the comrades either forgot to ask or failed in their attempts to persuade Communist China to deny a visa to Modi! I think such small ironies of life entirely escape our Indian Lefties who still think Stalin and Mao were 20th century versions of God.

So Modi as Ravana will become the leitmotif for India in the coming weeks. But don’t you honestly think we are going too far in our obsession to demonise the man? And that we are belittling ourselves and India in the bargain? I wont repeat stuff about how our media conveniently ignores the massacre of Sikhs in 1984 and the myriad massacres of Muslims in the (then) Bombay, in Bhagalpur, in Nellie, in Meerut and many other places in which surely Narendra Modi was not the ‘mastermind’ (there goes another word).