The earthquake in China has exposed the changing face of the country. Has it, really?
In the aftermath of the great Sichuan earthquake, we’ve seen a hopeful glimpse of China’s future: a more open & self-confident nation, and maybe – just maybe – the birth of grass-roots politics here. In traveling around China in the days after the quake, I was struck by how the public and the media initially seized the initiative from the government. Ordinary Chinese are traveling to the area to help move rubble, and tycoons, peasants and children are reaching into their pockets to donate to the victims. “I gave 500 yuan,” or about $72, a man told me in the western city of Urumqi. “Eighty percent of people in my work unit made donations. Everybody wants to help.” Private Chinese donations have already raised over $500 million. Such public spirit is a mark of citizens, not subjects. Soon after the quake, the Propaganda Department instinctively banned news organizations from reaching the area. But Chinese journalists ignored it – and the order was rescinded the next day. Now the Propaganda Department is ordering news organisations to report on how wonderful the relief efforts are. Many Chinese journalists are chafing instead to investigate corruption and why schools collapsed when government offices didn’t. The final score depends on whether those stories are published.
China-watchers have long debated whether the country is evolving toward greater freedom & pluralism. We see China following the trajectory of South Korea, Indonesia, Mongolia and other neighboring countries away from authoritarianism. Frankly, the evidence has been mixed, and skeptics are right to note that dissidents are still more likely to end up in jail than on the news. But on balance, the earthquake gives hope to us optimists. The rise of wealth, a middle class, education and international contacts are slowly undermining one-party rule and nurturing a new kind of politics.
Prime Minister Wen Jiabao is hard-working and blessed with nearly a photographic memory, but he also may be the second-most boring person alive (after his boss, President Hu Jintao). Both rose through the system as classic Communist apparatchiks – Brezhnevs with Chinese faces. Yet Wen has seen the political landscape changing and struggled in recent years to reinvent himself. When the quake hit, Wen flew immediately to the disaster area and appeared constantly on TV, overseeing rescue operations. Heroic tidbits seeped out. Wen fell and cut himself but refused medical attention. He bellowed directions to generals over the phone. He shouted to children buried in a pile of rubble: “This is Grandpa Wen Jiabao.
Children, you’ve got to hold on!” Wen’s conduct is striking because it’s what we expect of politicians, not dictators. His aim was to come across as a “good emperor,” not to win an election. But presumably he behaved in this way partly because he felt the hot breath of public opinion on his neck. China now has 75 million blogs, often carrying criticisms of the government, as well as tens of thousands of citizen protests each year. China’s police announced that they had punished 17 earthquake “rumor-mongers” last week, with penalties of up to 15 days in jail. But repression isn’t what it used to be, and dissidents now are often less afraid of the government than it is of them.
In the 1980s, China’s hard-liners ferociously denounced “heping yanbian” – “peaceful evolution” toward capitalism and democracy. My hunch is that the Communist Party is lurching in the direction, over 10 or 20 years, of becoming a Social Democratic Party that dominates the country but grudgingly allows opposition victories and a free press. China today reminds me of Taiwan when I lived there in the late 1980s, when the government was still trying to be dictatorial but just couldn’t get away with it.
Back then, the smartest of the Taiwan apparatchiks, like a young Harvard-educated party official named Ma Ying-jeou, glimpsed the future and began to reinvent themselves. The epilogue: Ma took office this week as the newly elected president of a democratic Taiwan.
For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article
Source : IIPM Editorial, 2008
In the aftermath of the great Sichuan earthquake, we’ve seen a hopeful glimpse of China’s future: a more open & self-confident nation, and maybe – just maybe – the birth of grass-roots politics here. In traveling around China in the days after the quake, I was struck by how the public and the media initially seized the initiative from the government. Ordinary Chinese are traveling to the area to help move rubble, and tycoons, peasants and children are reaching into their pockets to donate to the victims. “I gave 500 yuan,” or about $72, a man told me in the western city of Urumqi. “Eighty percent of people in my work unit made donations. Everybody wants to help.” Private Chinese donations have already raised over $500 million. Such public spirit is a mark of citizens, not subjects. Soon after the quake, the Propaganda Department instinctively banned news organizations from reaching the area. But Chinese journalists ignored it – and the order was rescinded the next day. Now the Propaganda Department is ordering news organisations to report on how wonderful the relief efforts are. Many Chinese journalists are chafing instead to investigate corruption and why schools collapsed when government offices didn’t. The final score depends on whether those stories are published.
China-watchers have long debated whether the country is evolving toward greater freedom & pluralism. We see China following the trajectory of South Korea, Indonesia, Mongolia and other neighboring countries away from authoritarianism. Frankly, the evidence has been mixed, and skeptics are right to note that dissidents are still more likely to end up in jail than on the news. But on balance, the earthquake gives hope to us optimists. The rise of wealth, a middle class, education and international contacts are slowly undermining one-party rule and nurturing a new kind of politics.
Prime Minister Wen Jiabao is hard-working and blessed with nearly a photographic memory, but he also may be the second-most boring person alive (after his boss, President Hu Jintao). Both rose through the system as classic Communist apparatchiks – Brezhnevs with Chinese faces. Yet Wen has seen the political landscape changing and struggled in recent years to reinvent himself. When the quake hit, Wen flew immediately to the disaster area and appeared constantly on TV, overseeing rescue operations. Heroic tidbits seeped out. Wen fell and cut himself but refused medical attention. He bellowed directions to generals over the phone. He shouted to children buried in a pile of rubble: “This is Grandpa Wen Jiabao.
Children, you’ve got to hold on!” Wen’s conduct is striking because it’s what we expect of politicians, not dictators. His aim was to come across as a “good emperor,” not to win an election. But presumably he behaved in this way partly because he felt the hot breath of public opinion on his neck. China now has 75 million blogs, often carrying criticisms of the government, as well as tens of thousands of citizen protests each year. China’s police announced that they had punished 17 earthquake “rumor-mongers” last week, with penalties of up to 15 days in jail. But repression isn’t what it used to be, and dissidents now are often less afraid of the government than it is of them.
In the 1980s, China’s hard-liners ferociously denounced “heping yanbian” – “peaceful evolution” toward capitalism and democracy. My hunch is that the Communist Party is lurching in the direction, over 10 or 20 years, of becoming a Social Democratic Party that dominates the country but grudgingly allows opposition victories and a free press. China today reminds me of Taiwan when I lived there in the late 1980s, when the government was still trying to be dictatorial but just couldn’t get away with it.
Back then, the smartest of the Taiwan apparatchiks, like a young Harvard-educated party official named Ma Ying-jeou, glimpsed the future and began to reinvent themselves. The epilogue: Ma took office this week as the newly elected president of a democratic Taiwan.
For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article
Source : IIPM Editorial, 2008
An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative
Read these article :-
ZEE BUSINESS BEST B SCHOOL SURVEY
B-schooled in India, Placed Abroad (Print Version)
IIPM in Financial times (Print Version)
IIPM makes business education truly global (Print Version)
The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM)
IIPM Campus
Top Articles on IIPM:-
'This is one of Big B's best performances'
IIPM to come up at Rajarhat
IIPM awards four Bengali novelists
IIPM makes business education truly global-Education-The Times of ...
The Hindu : Education Plus : Honour for IIPM
IIPM ranked No.1 B-School in India, Management News - By ...
IIPM Ranked No1 B-School in India
Moneycontrol >> News >> Press- News >> IIPM ranked No1 B-School in ...
IIPM ranked No. 1 B-school in India- Zee Business Survey ...
IIPM ranked No1 B-School in India :: Education, Careers ...
The Hindu Business Line : IIPM placements hit a high of over 2000 jobs
Deccan Herald - IIPM ranked as top B-School in India
India eNews - IIPM Ranked No1 B-School in India
IIPM Delhi - Indian Institute of Planning and Management New Delhi ...domain-b.com : IIPM ranked ahead of IIMs
No comments:
Post a Comment